Showing posts with label sigma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sigma. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Sigma 70-300 APO DG MACRO review


For Canon user especially who just into the world of photography and happen to just bought himself or herself a beginner level DSLR, kit lens that came with the body isn't enough, especially if you're into bird, animals or even street photography. For some the 55mm end isn't enough, so they need a better lens, dedicated in long range photography.

Sure you can buy the fast Canon EF 70- 200 f/2.8 IS USM with a lump of money or maybe selling your liver but there are always alternative to these telephoto lens.

For canon user, there are actually there models that are cheap enough and also providing decent image quality. Best bang for the bucks they say. The Canon EF 75-300mm USM III, the Canon EF-S 55-250mm IS, the Tamron 70-300mm or maybe the Sigma 70-300 APO DG MACRO. For me i took the Sigma lens.
Sigma 70-300mm f/4 -5.6 APO DG MACRO





I bought it for RM 750, maybe about 230 dollar. The package include a lens bag, lens cap, manual, guarantee card, resits and also the lens itself.

Physically, it was quite heavy although not as heavy as a 70-200 barrel but it was heavy for person like me, skinny and doesn't usually use telephoto lens. It weigh around 0.5 kg to be exact. The body are made from metal so the build quality is good in this lens. The zoom and focusing ring are quite smooth i can say but for me, i find it confusing sometimes to zoom because for canon lens, to increase you zoom range you have to rotate it clockwise but for this lens it's anticlockwise. But nonetheless, that was not a major problem. The maximum length of the lens could be very long to some people but it was nothing.



I have taken many picture with this lens and i can say that under good lighting condition, the image produces could be really nice. The lens do hunt especially at night so to overcome that do focus first then zoom in. For macro mode, set it to manual, rotate to the maximum length which is 300mm then turn the macro button on then rotate the zoom ring the the maximum level. Then if you don't trust your eyes much in determining the focusing, feel free to turn the AF on again. It still hunt sometimes but for most of the times, it went well.

The macro mode for this lens come in ration of 1:2. So don't expect to get a picture whereby you can count how many eyes does the fly have, you can get a great photo of flower or such but a lot of practice needed to be done first if you're just into macro shooting. Few shot after the jump.







On the side note, it's difficult for me to find it's weakness. Sure it does hunt in low light, it is not fast as the f/2.8 telephoto, it is not a white barrel(they look awesome to me though.) but it was great. Another downsize of the lens is that it does not have stabilization unit built in the lens. If you have really shaky hands and really depend on stabilization unit to not make your photo blur, feel free to get the Canon EF-Ss 55-250mm IS. I does have IS unit or image stabilization. But in my opinion, for telephoto, tripod and a fast shutter speed is indeed compulsory. Stabilization just like the icing on the cake. It make it much better.




Quality side, i guess you have to search for it else where because sadly i don't have any other telephoto lens to compare with.



Overall i can say that this lens is very nice lens to have. For a starter, it gave you a macro capabilities and also a telephoto properties. Both although not at the very best, is good enough for a beginner. And if you still have doubt about the lens, feel free to stop by any shop that sells this lens, try it for yourself, take some picture with it and then compare with the other lens you have in mind.

If you want to view more photo's that are taken with the lens just drop by my flickr by clicking on the flickr button on you left or just visit it here

Do we need reason to love a person


It's 2.30 a.m in the morning. Just finish watching Koizora, Sky of Love. I know, i know how "jiwang''ish the title can represent. Same goes with the story. You might not know this but i love sad love story. Weird, but that's me.

Koizora, a story of a girl and a boy like always falling in love with each other, blablablabla, uh, just google em already:) I'm too lazy to do so right now :) Anyhow, if you happen to love 1 litre of tear, like you do Mas Melor, maybe you can check this out. Only 6 episode but halfway and you'll be shedding tear. Trust me. I do.

This is getting more weirder, i guy shed tear and love sad romance story? I you I you ke dia ni? hmm. Absolutely NOT! I just like it. It help me to release some emotional stress due to everything around me. NOT jiwang, but sentimental. Eh betul ke ayat ni? ah tak kesah la. As long i'm happy kn kawan2?


*****

Anyway, you should really check it out. I should get some sleep now. Half day walk around KL do make me tired. Tomorrow can continue with Bloody Monday 2 :)

p/s: Already bought my nissin Di622 speedlite and also Sigma 70-300 APO DG macro :) can't wait to test it under sunlight :)
p/s: on side note, burn a lot of money because of it. 13oo ringgit :(

Friday, April 16, 2010

WAHHYYY???

Why? You cruel lens manufacturer. Why don't you guys build a lens that have image/optical stabilizer and with a telephoto compatibilities yet selling at a cost less than 400 USD??? I Seriously needed one that is very cheap yet very great for amateur.

Gah! Now i have no other choice but to pick this Canon EF-S 55-250 mm f/4.5 -5.6 IS lens for about Rm 1000. It a good lens on what most of the amateur have reviewed but still I prefer a sturdier, wider aperture and fast lens especially for telephoto. But who am i to brag, 1000 ringgit for an L- series Canon lens is out of this world.



been craving for this one for quite some time now :)


I seriously wanted this




this is the OS version btw.

A Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG MACRO but one thing that slack is the lack of OS(optical stabilizer, just another name for IS) in this lens. I really wanted a Sigma lens mainly because it better build quality compared to the canon above(sigma with metal mount. Makes it tougher. Canon with plastic. Not good for earth)

*updated*

There is actually an OS version of this lens, namely Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG OS. OH YES! OH YES! it cost rm 300 more than the Canon 55-250 but considering all the factor, i might go on with this. Now i just need more review :)

one reason why i prefer sigma is that, it comes with a free lens hood :) no need to shell out more money on hood.



All said, now i only require the money. Petronas when you want to increase my money to rm1000 a month please? teheeeee.....


until then :)